What this page shows

The world balance behind the strait: how much supply the war removed, and what absorbed it.
Data: EIA STEO October 2026 edition (observed through Jul 2026; later months are EIA estimates, drawn dashed) · EIA PSM imports through 2026-06 · refreshed 2026-10-21 02:21 UTC

2026 vs 2025: Production, Consumption & Where the Gap Went EIA STEO

world totals · Jan–Oct
Supply shortfall vs 2025
1,598 M bbl
production below the same months of 2025
Demand destruction
644 M bbl
consumption below 2025 · 40% of the gap
Storage draw
446 M bbl
consumption above production · 28% of the gap
Foregone stock build
508 M bbl
2025 ran a surplus that could not recur · 32%
Left: world production and consumption this year (dashed = EIA estimate) against the same months last year. Right: how each month's supply shortfall (white line) was absorbed — demand destruction, storage draw and foregone build; the three sum to the shortfall by identity.

Gulf producers' crude output vs 2025 EIA STEO 3d

change vs the same month last year, M bbl/day
ProducerMar– 2025Mar– 2026Δ
Saudi Arabia9.357.13 -24%
Iraq4.342.34 -46%
Kuwait2.481.28 -48%
Iran3.372.66 -21%
Oman0.770.85 +10%
Bahrain0.180.06 -67%
Each line is a producer's output minus its own output in the same month of 2025, so the war-driven loss reads directly off the axis; the table gives March-onward averages. Saudi Arabia (Petroline) and Oman (already outside the strait) are the bypass-capable producers; Iraq and Kuwait have no seaborne alternative. STEO itemizes only OPEC/OPEC+ members, so the UAE and Qatar are not available here.

US crude imports from Persian Gulf countries EIA PSM

thousand bbl/day · monthly
The most direct demand-side witness to the strait closure: US refiners' intake of Persian Gulf crude (series MCRIMUSPG2). Latest: 2026-06 = 113 kb/d vs 524 kb/d in the same month a year earlier. Red bars = March 2026 onward.

OPEC vs non-OPEC supply response EIA STEO 3a

M bbl/day · bars = year-on-year change
Is the Gulf loss being backfilled? Left: OPEC and non-OPEC total liquids, this year (dashed = estimate) vs last. Right: the year-on-year change in each, stacked; the white line is the world net change. Caveat: producers that have left OPEC (the UAE among them) sit inside the non-OPEC aggregate, which masks growth elsewhere.

US petroleum product consumption vs 2025 EIA STEO 4a

year-on-year change, M bbl/day · US only
Where demand destruction lands by product, for the one economy STEO breaks out: gasoline, jet fuel, distillate, residual and total US consumption as year-on-year differences. STEO has no world-level product split; a flat US line means the world's demand destruction happened elsewhere (Asian and other non-OECD importers).

Regional consumption vs 2025 EIA STEO 3a

year-on-year change, M bbl/day · by region
RegionMar–Oct 2025Mar–Oct 2026Change
China16.4515.74 -0.71 (-4.3%)
Other Asia14.8514.55 -0.30 (-2.0%)
Non-OECD total58.1256.32 -1.80 (-3.1%)
United States20.7920.57 -0.22 (-1.0%)
OECD Europe13.7213.50 -0.22 (-1.6%)
Japan2.952.77 -0.18 (-6.2%)
OECD total46.4445.47 -0.96 (-2.1%)
Averages in M bbl/day for March onward (the war months); totals overlap their members.
Where the demand destruction landed, by region. Each line is a region's consumption minus its consumption in the same month of 2025, so a line below zero means that region is using less oil than a year ago. Non-OECD total includes China and Other Asia; OECD total includes the United States, OECD Europe and Japan. Months after Jul 2026 are EIA estimates (dashed). The regional split is the closest STEO gets to showing who absorbed the Hormuz shortfall: Asian importers depend most on Gulf crude, so their lines usually fall first.
Ads keep this site free. Privacy Policy · Cookie preferences · About & sources · RSS feed